Appraisal of Genetic Variability and Seasonal Interaction for Yield and Quality Traits in Maize ( Zea mays  L.)

Dhairyashil Madhukar Langade; Shahi J. P.; Srivastava K.; Singh A.; Agarwal V. K.; Sharma A.

Appraisal of Genetic Variability and Seasonal Interaction for Yield and Quality Traits in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Dhairyashil Madhukar Langade

, Shahi J. P.

, Srivastava K.

, Singh A.

, Agarwal V. K.

, Sharma A.

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, Varanasi (U.P.) – 221005, India;

Author

Correspondence author
Plant Gene and Trait, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 18 doi: 10.5376/pgt.2013.04.0018
Received: 27 Jun., 2013 Accepted: 15 Aug., 2013 Published: 12 Sep., 2013

This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Preferred citation for this article:

Langade et al., 2013, Appraisal of Genetic Variability and Seasonal Interaction for Yield and Quality Traits in Maize (Zea mays L.), Plant Gene and Trait, Vol.4, No.18 95-103 (doi: 10.5376/pgt.2013.04.0018)

Abstract

Knowledge of the genetic components of variances and inter-relationships between yield and its quality traits will improve the efficiency of breeding programmes through the use of appropriate selection indices, taking into consideration for ten inbreds of maize obtained from All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project. Ten inbreds were evaluated in a Randomized Block Design with three replications. Highest PCV and GCV were observed for oil content preceded by days to 50% tasseling and days to 50% silking. High heritability were observed for days to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking, protein content, starch content and number of kernels row^-1. High heritability with high genetic advance were observed for days to 50% tasseling and days to 50% silking which indicated that most likely the heritability was due to the influence of additive genes and selection may be effective for such traits. Highest significant and positive correlation were found between days to 50% tasseling and days to 50% silking followed by association of ear height and plant height; number of kernels row^-1 and ear length; ear diameter and ear length. Significant and negative association were found between ear height and days to 50% tasseling; ear height and days to 50% silking; starch content and oil content. Oil content was recorded maximum positive direct effect on yield. Direct effect of ear length, ear diameter, 100 kernel weight, oil content and starch content on yield was positive and high.

Keywords

Correlation; Path coefficients; Oil; Variances

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important food crops in the world with highest production and productivity. It is grown in more than 166 countries in diverse seasons for diverse uses in different agro-ecological conditions due to its high yield potential. The major maize growing countries are USA, China, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and India (FAO, 2007).

The success of any crop improvement programme is dependent not only on the amount of genetic variability present in the population, but also on the extent to which it is heritable, therefore, is a key component of breeding programmes for broadening the gene pool of crops (Ahmad et al.,2011). Yield is a complex quantitative character controlled by many genes interacting with the environment and is the product of many factors called yield components. Selection of parents based on yield alone is often misleading. The appropriate knowledge of such interrelationships between yield and its contributing components can significantly improve the efficiency of breeding programmes through the use of appropriate selection indices (Mohammadia et al.,2003).

Path coefficient analysis furnishes information of influence of each contributing trait to yield directly as well as indirectly (Farshadfar, 2004) and also enables breeders to rank the genetic attributes according to their contribution and thus, useful in indirect selection and of elite genotypes from diverse genetic populations. Therefore, availability of good knowledge of these genetic parameters existing in different yield contributing characters and the relative proportion of genetic information in various quantitative traits is a pre-requisite for effective crop improvement.

Results

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the seasons were significant for DTT, DTS, PH, ED, KR, PY, OC, PC, SC and SuC. Interactions were non- significant for all the traits. Treatments were significant for almost all the characters which indicated that lot of genetic variability were present among the different genotypes. The ANOVA is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Analysis of variance of Randomized Block Design for 10 characters in maize inbreds

Phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was slightly higher than the genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the characters studied, which indicated that environment also played a considerable role in expression of these characters. There was a close resemblance between PCV and GCV for all the characters indicating that selection for these characters would be effective. The PCV ranged from 43.16 for OC to 4.03 for SC. Highest PCV was recorded for OC followed by DTT and DTS. Lowest PCV was recorded for SC followed by PC and PH. Highest GCV was observed for DTT followed by DTS and OC. Lowest GCV was observed for SC succeeded by PC and KR.The highest environmental coefficient of variation (ECV) was accorded for PY followed by OC and PtY and lowest for SC succeeded by PC and DTT.

High heritability was recorded for DTT, DTS followed by PC, SC and KR. Moderate heritability were observed for OC, PH followed by SuC, EH, EL and ED. Rest of the characers exhibited low heritability.

High genetic advance were recorded for traits viz., DTT followed by DTS and PH. Rest of the attributes recorded low genetic advance. The genetic advance as percentage of mean were accorded for characters viz., DTT, DTS, OC, KR, EH and PtY. High heritability with high genetic advance was recorded for DTT and DTS (Table 2).

Table 2 Components of variability of yield and yield contributing traits in maize inbreds

Highest significant and positive correlation was observed between DTT and DTS followed by EL and KR, PH and EH, ED and KR, EL and ED, KR and KRE, correlation of DTT and DTS with KRE, ED and KRE, KRE and OC, PC and SuC, PC and SC, EH and KW, EL and KRE. A high significant and positive correlation was found for DTT and DTS with ED and EL, between KR and OC, EH and SuC, EH and OC, KW and SuC, PH and KW and SC and SuC (Table 3).

Table 3 Estimates of genotypic (rg) and phenotypic (rp) correlation coefficients among 10 characters in maize germplasm

Significant and negative association was found between KR and PC, ED and PC, KRE and SuC, EL and SuC, PH and KRE, EH and ED, DTT and DTS with SuC, DTS and KW, EH and KRE, PH and ED, KRE and PC, KW and PC, OC and SC, KW and SC, correlation of DTT and DTS with PH, OC and PC and correlation of DTT and DTS with EH.

Direct or indirect effects are categorized as follows, negligible when values are between 0.00~0.09, low when the values range from 0.10~0.19, moderate for values between 0.20~0.29, high for values 0.30~0.99 and values more than 1.00 are categorized as very high (Lenka and Mishra, 1973). The path analysis first suggested by Wright (1921) and later illustrated by Dewey and Lu (1959) provides an effective measure of direct and indirect causes of association and depicts the relative importance of each factor involved in contributing to the final product.

Direct and positive effect on grain yield was exhibited by DTT, PH, EH, EL, ED, KW, OC, PC and SC where as direct and negative effects were exhibited by DTS, KR, KRE and SuC (Table 4).

Table 4 Direct and indirect effect of different characters on plant yield per plant at genotypic and phenotypic level in maize inbreds

Among these, PH recorded negligible positive directs, whereas the direct effect of EH and PC was positive and low. The direct contribution of DTT on yield was positive and very high whereas, the direct contribution of DTS was negative and very high. Direct effect of EL, ED, KW, OC and SC on grain yield was positive and high. Negative and high direct effects were observed for KR. KRE and SuC showed negative and low direct effects. OC recorded maximum positive direct effect on yield (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Phenotypical and genotypical path diagrams showing the direct and indirect effects on yield

Discussion

The knowledge of genetic variation is important for selection in crop improvement programmes. The success of any crop improvement programme is dependent not only on the amount of genetic variability present in the population, but also on the extent to which it is heritable, which sets the limit of progress that can be achieved through selection (Sumathi et al., 2005; Najeeb et al., 2009; Hussain et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2011 and Wang et al., 2011).

The phenotypic expression of a character is the manifestation of genotype, environment and interaction between the genotype by environment. The genotypic coefficient of variation measures the extent of genetic variability present in a crop species and also enables to quantify the extent of variability present in different characters. Therefore, the total variance needs to be partitioned into heritable and non-heritable components to assess the true breeding nature of that particular trait.

Heritability is a measure of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic causes providing information on the extent to which a particular morphogenetic character can be transmitted to successive generations. Knowledge of heritability influences the choice of breeding procedures, to predict gain from selection and to determine the relative importance of genetic effects (Kashiani et al., 2010; Laghari et al., 2010).

The most important function of heritability in genetic studies of quantitative characters is its predictive role to indicate the reliability of phenotypic value as a guide to breeding value (Falconer and Mackay, 1996). Characters with high heritability can easily be fixed with simple selection resulting in quick progress. However, it has been accentuated that heritability alone has no practical importance without genetic advance (Najeeb et al., 2009). Genetic advance shows the degree of gain obtained in a character under a particular selection pressure.

DTT, DTS, KR, PC and SC recorded high heritability in broad sense, which indicates that though the character is least influenced by the environmental effects, selection may not be useful as broad sense heritability is based on total genetic variance which includes both fixable and non-fixable variances. It would be useful only when the fixable proportion is known. KRE and KW recorded low heritability which indicated that the character is highly influenced by environmental effects and genetic improvement through selection will be difficult due to masking effects of environment on the genotypic effects.

DTT and DTS recorded high genetic advance which indicates that the character is governed by additive genes and selection will be rewarding for improvement of such trait (Reddy and Agarwal, 1992; Singhal et al., 2006; Najeeb et al., 2009; Muhammad Rafiq et al., 2010). Low genetic advance were observed for EL, ED, KR, KRE, KW, OC, PC, SC and SuC elucidating that the character is governed by non-additive genes and heterosis breeding may be useful in such a situation. High heritability with high genetic advance was recorded for DTT and DTS which indicated that most likely the heritability is due to the influence of additive genes and selection may be effective for such traits.

If correlation between two traits is significant and positive, it indicates that increase in one character will lead to a simultaneous increase in the paired character and if the correlation is significant and negative, increase or decrease in one character, will lead to increase or decrease in the other paired character or vice-versa. Yield is complex trait and is dependent on several contributing traits. Hence, trait association was studied to assess the relationship among yield, its components enhancing the usefulness of selection. Genotypic correlations reveal the existence of real associations, whereas the phenotypic correlations may occur by chance. Significant phenotypic correlations without genotypic association are of no value. If the genotypic correlation is significant and phenotypic is not, it means the existing real association is masked by environment effect. This indicates the importance of genotypic correlation compared to phenotypic correlation.

Zozulya (1971) found significant positive correlation between oil content and plant yield of maize. Chmeleva et al (1988) studied significant positive correlation between protein and oil contents. Proksza and Harmati (1988) revealed that oil yield were usually high in hybrids with moderate oil content coupled with high yielding capacity. Lambert et al (1997) reported high oil hybrids with increased oil content were found to be inferior in grain yield than normal hybrids. Mittal et al (1998) reported that DTS and DTT were important parameters for estimating maturity under Indian conditions.

Yield attributing traits such as EL, ED, KR, KRE, TW showed significant association with yield and negative association with DTT, DTS, PH and EH. These similar findings were supported by Sofi and Rather (2007), Muhammad Rafiq et al (2010), Pavan et al (2011), Raghu et al (2011) and Ravi et al (2012).

Path coefficient provides more information among variables than do correlation coefficients since this analysis provides the direct effects of specific yield components on yield, and indirect effects via other yield components (Garcia Del Moral et al., 2003). Path coefficient analysis allows separation of the direct effect and their indirect effects through other attributes by partitioning the correlations (Wright, 1921).

Direct and positive effect on grain yield was exhibited by DTT, PH, EH, EL, ED, KW, OC, PC and SC indicating the effectiveness of direct selection whereas direct and negative effects were exhibited by DTS, KR, KRE and SuC indicating the effectiveness of indirect selection. These findings were in corroboration with Muhammad Rafiq et al (2010), Pavan et al (2011), Raghu et al (2011) and Ram Reddy et al (2012).

High positive direct effect of test weight was also reported by Singhal et al (2006), Saidaiah et al (2008), Zarei et al (2012). The high direct effect of this trait appears to be the main factor for their strong association with grain yield. Hence, direct selection for these traits would be effective.

Conclusion

From the above experiment, it can be concluded that all the genotypes interacted with seasons differently for different traits viz., DTT, DTS, PH, ED, KR, PY, OC, PC, SC and SuC. Some of the traits showed stability which elucidated that no effect of season’s were observed on them viz., EH, PH, KRE, KW, PtY. High heritability with high genetic advance were observed for days to 50% tasseling and days to 50% silking. The inter relationship between component traits is also valuable in selection criteria because they directly or indirectly influenceeconomic quality traits such as OC, PC, SC and SuC which can help to produce specialty corns.

Materials and Methods

The present investigation entitled “Utility of Quality and Morphological traits as a selection criterion of yield improvement in specialty corns (Zea mays L.)” was carried out during Rabi 2011-2012 and Kharif 2012season at the Research Farm of Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. The experimental material consisted of ten inbreds of maize obtained from the All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project, Varanasi. Details of ten inbred is presented in Table 5.

Table 5 Inbreds used in experiment and their morphology

Ten inbreds were sown in a Randomized Block Design with three replications. Each entry was sown as single row of 4 meter length with row-to-row and plant-to-plant distance of 60 cm and 20 cm respectively. Initially two seeds per hill were sown and later on one plant was thinned to maintain single plant per hill. Two border rows were also planted to avoid the border effect. The crop was raised as per the recommended package of practices. Observations viz., days to 50% tasseling (DTT), days to 50% silking (DTS), plant height (PH) (cm), ear height (EH) (cm), ear length (EL) (cm), ear diameter (ED) (cm), number of kernels row^-1 (KR), number of kernel rows ear^-1 (KRE), 100 kernels weight (KW) (g), plant grain yield (PY) (g), plot yield (PtY) (kg), oil content (OC) (%), protein content (PC) (%) , starch content (SC) (%) and sugar content (SuC) (%) were recorded on ten plants selected randomly from each inbred in each replication. Later on it was adjusted at 15% moisture and 80% shelling. Moisture percentage was measured by taking kernel samples from the bulk and recorded by electronic moisture meter. The kernels taken for quality analyses were used from self pollinated plant as to avoid xenia effect.

Quality analysis was done by FOSS Infratec^™ 1241 NIRS. Near Infrared measurements of grain have performance when measuring in transmittance (570~1050 nm) and reflectance (1100~2500 nm) mode. The model for analyses of variance included seasons, replications, genotypes and genotype by season interaction. An analysis using means over replications allowed the generation of entry least square means. For each trait, inbred means were the average values calculated from all the replications in both seasons. Calculation of correlation coefficients involved trait values paired by inbred. The statistical analysis was done by using Indostat Version 8.1.

The mean data will be subjected to following statistical analyses: Variances, mean, range and coefficient of variability will be assessed following Panse and Sukhatme, 1967; Computation of correlation coefficients will be done as per Searle, 1961; Path coefficient analysis (Dewey and Lu, 1959).

Acknowledgement

This manuscript is a part of Ph. D. research work of first author. He is grateful to the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi and AICRP on Maize, Varanasi.

References

Ahmad S.Q., Khan S., Ghaffar M., and Ahmad F., 2011, Genetic diversity analysis for yield and other parameters in maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes, Asian J. Agric. Sci., 3(5):385-388

Alake C.O., Ojo D.K., Oduwaye O.A., and Adekoya M.A., 2008, Genetic variability and correlation studies in yield and yield related characters of tropical maize (Zea mays L.), ASSET – Series A: Agriculture and Environment, 8(1/2):14-27

Chmeleva Z.V., Glukhova V.M., and Shalygina O., 1988, Chemical composition of the grain yield of maize and its variation, Naucho-Tekhnichekii Byulletin, 180: 23-28

Dewey D.R., and Lu K.H., 1959, A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production, Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-518
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.000219620-05100090002x

Falconer D.S., and Mackay T.F.C., 1996, Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed. Benjamin Cummings, England, pp. 245-247

Farshadfar E., 2004, Multivariate principles and procedures of statistics, Taghbostan Pub. Kermanshah, Iran, pp. 734

Garcia Del Moral L.F., Rharrabti Y., Villegas D., and Royo C., 2003, Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions, An Ontogenic Approach, Agronomy Journal, 95: 266-274
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0266

Hussain N., Khan M.Y., and Baloch M.S., 2011, Screening of maize varieties for grain yield at Dera Ismail Khan, J. Animal and Plant Sci., 21(3):626-628

Kashiani P., Saleh G., Abdullah N.A.P., and Abdullah SN., 2010, Variation and genetic studies on selected sweet corn inbred lines, Asian J. Crop Sci., 2(2):78-84
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2010.78.84

Khan K., Sher H., Iqbal M., and Al-Qurainy F., 2011, Development and release of indigenous maize hybrids to enhance maize yield in Khyber-Pakhtoonkhua province of Pakistan, Afri. J. Agric. Res., 6(16):3789-3792

Kumar V., Singh P.K., and Guptha A., 2011, Studies of genetic diversity in quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds, Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 3(2):96-99

Laghari K.A., Sial M.A., Afzal Arain M.A., Mirbahar A.A., Pirzada A.J., Dahot M.U., and Mangrio S.M., 2010, Heritability studies of yield and yield associated traits in bread wheat, Pak. J. Bot., 42(1):111-115

Lambert R.J., Alexander D.E., Mollring E.L., and Wiggens B., 1997, Selection for increased oil concentration in maize kernels and associated changes in several kernel traits, Maydica, 42:39-43

Lenka D., and Mishra B., 1973, Path coefficient analysis of yield in rice varieties, Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 43:376-379

Mittal V.K., Dhillon B.S., and Saxena V.K., 1997, Evaluation of maturity in maize, Crop Improvement, 24:135-136

Mohammadia S.A., Prasanna B.M., and Singh N.N., 2003, Sequential path model for determining interrelationship among grain yield and related characters in maize, Crop Sci., 43:1690-1697
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1690

Muhammad R., Amer H., and Mohammad Altaf., 2010. Studies on heritability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.), J. of Agricultural Research, 48(1):35-38

Najeeb S., Rather A.G., Parray G.A., Sheikh F.A., and Razvi S.M., 2009, Studies on genetic variability, genotypic correlation and path coefficient analysis in maize under the high altitude temperate conditions of Kashmir, Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 83:46.

Panse VG., and Sukhatme PV., 1967, Statistical Method for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, Pub. New Delhi

Pavan R., Lohithaswa H.C., Wali M.C., Gangashetty P., and Shekhara BG., 2011, Correlation and path analysis of grain yield and yield attributing traits in single cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.), Electronic J. of Plant Breeding, 2(2): 253-257

Proksza P., and Harmati I., 1988, Starch, protein and oil contents of maize hybrids, Novenytermeles, 37(1):17-26

Raghu B., Suresh J., Kumar S., and Saidaiah P., 2011, Character association and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.), Madras Agricultural Journal, 98(1-3):7-9

Ram Reddy V., Sheshagiri Rao A., and Sudarshan MR., 2012, Heritability and character association among grain yield and its components in maize (Zea mays L.), J. of Research ANGRAU, 40(2):45-49

Ravi V.M., and Chikkalingaiah Shailaja H., 2012, Correlation study for protein content, grain yield and yield contributing traits in quality protein maize (Zea mays L.), Electronic J. of Plant Breeding, 3(1):649-651

Reddy KHP., and Agarwal BD., 1992, Estimation of genetic variation in an improved population of maize (Zea mays L.), Madras Agricultural Journal, 79:714-719

Saidaiah P., Satyanarayana E., and Kumar SS, 2008, Association and path coefficient analysis in maize (Zea mays L.), Agricultural Science Digest, 28:79-83

Searle SR., 1961, The value of endive of selection, J. Mass selection, 21:682-709

Singhal N., Verma S.S., Baskheti D.C., and Kumar A., 2006, Heritability, genetic advance, correlation and path-coefficient estimation in high quality protein maize (Zea mays L.), Asian Journal of Bio Science, 1(2):54-56

Sofi P., and Rather A.G., 2007, Studies on genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.), International J. of Agricultural Sciences, 3(2): 292-293

Sumathi P., Nirmalakumari A., and Mohanraj K., 2005, Genetic variability and traits interrelationship studies in industrially utilized oil rich CIMMYT lines of maize (Zea mays L), Madras Agricultural Journal, 92(10-12):612-617

Wang X., Chang J., Qin G., Zhang S., Cheng X., and Li C., 2011, Analysis on yield components of elite maize variety Xundan 20 with super high yield potential, Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6(24):5490-5495

Wright S., 1921, Correlation and Causation, Journal of Agricultural Research, 20: 557-585

Zarei B., Kahrizi D., Aboughadaresh A.P., and Sadeghi F., 2012, Correlation and path coefficient analysis for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in corn hybrids, International J. of Agri. and Crop Sci., 4(20):1519-1522

Zozulya A.L., 1971, Correlation between oil content and other economic characters in maize, Selektsiya i Semenovodstva Resp. Mezhved. Temat. Nauck, 19:52-57

Plant Gene and Trait

• Volume 4