The lakoocha (Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb.), most popularly known as “monkey jack” or ‘barhal’ and pachoo phanas in local language (bangalore) in India, belonging to family moraceae, originated from South East Asia and is widely distributed in the humid sub-himalayan regions of India. Itis regarded as underutilized fruit, although “lakoocha” is grown mainly in Uttar Pradesh, Bengal, Khasi Hills and Western Ghats, because of lack of commercial orchards, lesser consumer preference and poor marketability. Recent commercial interest in several tropical and subtropical underutilized fruits has resulted in an increased cultivation area in Asia and other regions of the developing world due to high level of vitamins and minerals has been recorded in a number of underutilized fruits. The export of fruits from Asia alone has been increasing by a little over 10% annually (Singh, 1993). Most commonly, leaves of these trees serves as green fodder for cattle due to their rich source of crude protein, fibers and mineral (Joshee et al.,2002). These trees grow upto 6 to 12 m tall with large, leathery and deciduous leaves but with fruits of no edible value. Yet the choice of the fruit in Ayurveda and Siddha medicines are due to their multivarious active principles. The medicinal principles that have been well documented in A. lakoocha includes tannins (Doss et al., 2009), flavonoids (Mandalari et al., 2007; Maneechai et al., 2012), saponins (Avato et al., 2006), terpenoids (Funatogawa et al., 2004) and alkaloids (Navarro et al., 1999). Fruit pulp is used as liver tonic and bark extract is used in external ailments like heals boils, cracked skin and pimples (Shailendraet al., 2010). The stem is vermifuge and the stem bark is useful in curing tapeworm infection (Sambhandharaksa et al., 1962, Charoenlarp et al., 1981). A. lakoocha extract is also reported to have cosmetic ingredients (Tengamnuay et al., 2006).
With all these potential uses in pharmaceutical industry, there is a need for commercial orcharding and area expansion for which conventional methods of sexual and vegetative propagation have proved to be futile because of the inherent properties of poor seed viability and low germination percentage and poor response to vegetative means of cutting or grafting techniques (Napier and Robbins, 1989). This prompts for alternative approaches of developing propagules of A. lakoocha in large scale and micropropagation has been a promising tool that has been reported to be fruitful in developing successful plantlets.Where in the conventional propagation methods had been less successful or resulted in complete failure. There are few reports on micropropagation of A. lakoocha using in vitro raised seedlings (Joshee et al., 2002; Rahman and Amin, 1995) and some reports on jackfruits (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) by Abd El-Zaher (2008), Khan et al. (2010), Ashrafuzzaman et al. (2012). We report a rapid and efficient micropro- pagation protocol using nodal explants from 8 years old tree, for producing higher number of plantlets. This prototype system will facilitate commercial production of micropropagated plantletsof A. lakoocha as a source of providing genuine planting material.
1 Result and Analysis
1.1 Shoot bud induction and multiplication
Explants cultured in MS+BAP 13.33+IAA 2.28+GA3 0.577 µM recorded early bud induction in about 7.33 days which showed longer axillary shoot (4.567 cm/ explant) and heighest number of leaves (6.667 leaves/explant) (Table 1) than other treatments. However, MS+BAP 13.33+IAA 1.14 µM containing multiplication medium produced 6.667 microshoots/ explant which also showed maximum number of leaves (8.667 leaves/explant) and microshoot length (3.967 cm/explant) (Table 2).
Table 1 Effect of different concentration of plant hormones on in vitro shoot bud induction
|
Table 2 Effect ofdifferent concentration of cytokinin and auxin ratio on shoot multiplication
|
1.2 In vitro rooting in regenerated shoots
In vitro rooting was dependent on the strength of the medium and the auxin concentration as evident from Table 3. Among the various strength of media evaluated, IBA, IAA and BAP levels; ½ MS+IBA 8.88+IAA 1.14+BAP 0.89 µM+Activated charcoal 500 mg/L produced 88.16% rooting with heighest number of roots (4.33 roots/explant) over other treat- ments. In MS+IBA 13.33+IAA 1.14+BAP 0.89 µM, regenerated shoots produced longer roots (5.26 cm).
Table 3 Effect of different concentration of auxins and cytokinins on in vitro rooting
|
1.3 Hardening of in vitro plantlets
Acclimatization of the rooted plantlets was tested in various carrier substrates (Figure 1). A combination of Soil+Sand+Peat moss (1:1:2) supplemented with ½ MS nutrient solution was identified to be ideal substrate for acclimatization, as this treatment resulted in maximum plant survival rate (88.33%), longer plants (6.56 cm) with healthy and green canopy of leaves (8.33 leaves/plant). Although, longer roots (5.96 cm) were found in coconut husk carrier this treatment did not show efficient survival rates. Totally 46 plantlets survived in the greenhouse after one year.
Figure 1 Effect of carrier substrates on acclimatization of micropropagated plantlets
|
2 Discussion
2.1 Shoot bud induction and multiplication
Micropropagation of mature trees using vegetative parts as explants has been a difficult task due to various factors, like juvenility vs. maturity, inherent slow growing habit, exogenous and endogenous infection, presence of phenolic compounds, long complex life cycles, great genetic variations, etc. (Bonga and Durzan, 1986; Bajaj, 199; Ali et al., 2003; Liu and Yang, 2011). In vitro propagation of plant species is influenced by factors such as genotype, age and source of initial tissue/organ which in turn are related to their endogenous hormonal status (George, 1993). Most of the hardwood species produce phenolic compounds after wounding (George and Sherrington, 1984) which is also encountered in A. lakoocha. The phenolic substances on oxidation get converted into quinines which cause tissue blackening and inhibit new in vitro morphogenetic responses in plants. Phenolics could be minimized by keeping explants right from the time of collection to inoculation in antioxidant solution comprising of ascorbic acid, citric acid and PVP (Elmore et al., 1990; Liu and Yang, 2011). Polyvinylpyrollidine (PVP) is a polyamide which absorbs phenols through hydrogen bonding and thus prevents their oxidation. It is the mostly commonly used antioxidant in micro- propagation of hard wood trees like neem (Gautam et al. 1993); ascorbic acid was also reported to be potent antioxidant by Pati et al. (2008) and Abd El-Zaher (2008) during micropropagation process. In the present study, theexplants of A. lakoocha were given a pretreatment with PVP (25 µM) for one hour which was found to be effective in controlling oxidative browning.
Explants play major role in developing a prototype system for micropropagation of perennial hard wood trees. Different types of explants were tried by several research groups. Earlier, nodal stem segments were reported by and Pati et al. (2008) and Raj and Basavaraju (2012) in micropropagation of A. mormelos, an underutiliszed fruit crop;which proved to be successful because of the presence of protected axillary buds unaffected by toxicity due to surface sterilants and regeneration of true to type plantlets.
Optimization of explants was important for successful micropropagtion technique as this forms the prime factor for development of an efficient prototype system. Therefore, preliminary studies on establish- ment of aseptic cultures with ideal explants were carried out in A. lakoocha. Explants of mature lakoocha tree exhibit high level of exogenous and endogenous contamination. Surface sterilization with 0.1% mercuric chloride (HgCl2) for 8 min was found to be most effective for reducing contamination or infection levels in nodal stem segments in lakoocha. These results were on par with the earlier reports on surface sterilization using 0.1% mercuric chloride in Crataeva nurvala (Sharma and Pandey, 1996).
Media is another critical factor that positively or negatively influences the in vitro regeneration. In the present study, MS+BAP 13.33+IAA 2.28+GA3 0.57 µM was found to be statistically significant in terms of bud induction, longer axillary shoots and heighest number of leaves/explant of in vitro established culture. Hamid et al. (2007) reported that jackfruit explants cultured on MS+BAP 13.33+NAA 0.53µM produced the highest number of shoots, leaves/explant and shoot length. However, a combination of BAP with IAA (MS+BAP 13.33+IAA 1.14 µM) augmented multiplication of shoots. The synergetic effect of auxin along with cytokinins on shoot multiplication and shoot bud induction has been reported by several workers (Mannan et al, 2006; Abd El-Zaher 2008).
2.2 In vitro rooting in regenerated shoots
Finally, the microshoots were tested for rooting efficiency in medium with various auxin levels. Microshoots incubated on ½ MS IBA 9.85+IAA 1.14+ BAP 0.89 µM+Activated charcoal 500 mg/L signify- cantly enhanced the root induction (88.16%) and number (4.33). Roy et al. (1996) obtained successful rooting of in vitro shoots of jackfruit on ½ MS+ IBA 4.9 + NAA 5.37 µM. Most recently, Khan et al. (2010) have reported higher rooting rate (80%) and (6.9) numbers of roots per plant were obtained with IBA 14.77 µM in jack fruit.
2.3 Hardening of in vitro plantlets
Plantlets grown in vitro have been continuously exposed to controlled conditions for rapid plant growth and sudden transfer is impossible directly to pot which causes maximum mortality of micropropagated plants. A gradual acclimatization to natural environment is needed to increase survival rates and hence, an intermediary greenhouse hardening is done which depends mainly on the carrier substrates (Hazarika, 2003). Sand+ Soil+ Peat moss as carrier substrate with ½ strength MS nutrients has marked effect on the plant height, number of leaves/explant and overall survival of plants in lakoocha which was coinciding with the results in jackfruit (Roy et al., 1993; 1996). Acclimatization procedures have been attempted to increase ex vitro survival of plantlets upon transplanting (Roy et al., 1990; 1996; Amin and Jaiswal, 1993; Noweret et al., 2005; Pati et al., 2013). The in vitro raised plants showed profused growth when transplanted in soil.
The protocol establishes here is highly reproducible for the production of plantlets which is not possible with conventional methods. Plant growth regulators and the physiological activity of the explants are very important for successful regeneration. The plants that were under further evaluation for fruiting and quality characters. The plant regeneration protocol established in this investigation may facilitate future research in genetic transformation in lakoocha and related genus.
3 Materials andMethods
3.1 Establishment of culture
New shoots of 15~20 cm sizes from 8 year old tree of Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb were defoliated and collected in an aqueous solution of ascorbic acid (5.78 µM) and brought to the laboratory for further processing. The nodal explants were washed thoroughly under running tap water for 1h and treated with Reidomyl 0.1%+Timentin 1.05 mM in 100 ml of distilled water and 2 drops of Tween-20 for one hour to avoid bacterial and fungal pathogens. The segments were washed 3~4 times using sterile distilled water. A pre-treatment with chilled antioxidant solution comprising ascorbic acid (5.68 mM) and Polyvinylpyrollidine (25 µM) for 1 h was also followed in order to minimize in vitro oxidative browning due to phenolic compounds. Then the explants were rinsed with sterile double distilled water and taken to laminar hood for surface sterilization. Shoot buds were dipped in 70% ethanol for 30 seconds followed by air dried. The explants were treated with 0.1% HgCl2 for 8 minutes and then washed (3~4 times) with sterile distilled water and blotted dry on pre sterilized filter paper sheets.
Surface sterilized explants were placed vertically on MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) medium supple- mented with BAP (0, 2.22 µM, 4.44 µM, 8.88 µM and 13.33 µM), GA3 (0.57 µM), ADS (2.71 µM) and IAA (1.14 µM and 2.28 µM) for shoot bud induction and multiplication. All the media were added with 0.7% (w/v) agar and 3% (w/v) sucrose. The medium was changed 2~3 times over the first 10~14 days of the study to control phenolics exudates to establish cultures. Observations were recorded on morph- genetic characters such as days taken for bud break, number of leaf per explant, length of axillary shoots (cm) and average number of microshoots per explant after 30 days of culture of the explants.
3.2 In vitro rooting in regenerated shoots
Microshoots obtained in vitro were subjected to auxins and cytokine such as IBA (0, 9.85 µM, 14.77 µM and 19.70 µM), IAA (1.14 µM) and BAP (0.89 µM) in half and full strength of MS basal medium supplemented with sucrose 3%, activated charcoal 500 mg/l and agar 0.7%. Data were recorded on per cent rooting, number of roots, and length of roots. All cultures were incubated at (25±2)0C and were exposed to a photoperiod of 16/8 hours light and dark cycling in the culture room by cool white fluorescent tubes (80 mmol m2s-1) with 70%±5% relative humidity.
3.3 Hardening of in vitro plantlets
Eight week old rooted shoots, were shifted to six inch plastic cups for acclimatized filled with autoclaved Sand:Soil:Peat moss (1:1:2) and drenched with ½ strength MS nutrients. The plastic cups was covered with transparent polyethylene bags to prevent excess water loss for 3 weeks in growth room at (25±2)0C and then transferred to shade net house (100 mmol m2s-1; 50% shade 70%±5% RH) for secondary hardening. Survival percent were determined before field plantation. When 6~8 leaves emerged in the plants, they were shifted to field.
Abd El-Zaher M.H., 2008, Studies on micro-propagation of jackfruit 1-behaviour of the jackfruit plants through the micropropagation stages, World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(2): 263-279
Ali N., Mulwa R.M.S., Norton M.A. et al., 2003, Micropropagation of guava (Psidium guajava L.), J. Hort Sci. Biotechnol., 78: 739-741
Amin M.N., and Jaiswal V.S., 1993, In vitro response of apical bud explants from mature trees of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.), Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 33: 59-65
Ashrafuzzaman M., Sukarnakar, Dilafroza K. and Shamsul Haque P, 2012, In vitro regeneration and multiplication of Jack fruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus L.), Res. J. Biol., 2(2): 59-65
Avato P., Bucci R., Tava A., et al., 2006, Antimicrobial activity of saponins from Medicago sp.: structure-activity relationship, Phytotherapy Res., 20(6): 454-457
Bajaj Y.P.S., ed., 1997, Medicinal and miscellaneous plants, In: Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, VI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 313-391.
Bonga J.M., and Durzan D.J., eds., 1986, Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Vol. I. General principles and biotechnology, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.
Charoenlarp P., Radomyos P., and Harinasuta T., 1981, Treatment of taeniasis with Puag-Haad powder from Artocarpus lakoocha wood. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 12(4): 568-570
Doss A., Mubarack H.M., and Dhanabalan R., 2009, Pharmacological importance of Solanum trilobatum, Ind. J. Sci. Tech., 2(2): 41-43
Elmore H.W., Samples B., Sharma S., and Harrison M., 1990, Influence of cultural and physiochemical factor on ascorbate stabate stability in plant tissue culture media, Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 20: 131-135
Funatogawa K., Hayashi S., Shimomura H., et al., 2004, Antibacterial activity of hydrolyzable tannins derived from medicinal plants against Helicobacter pylori, Microb. Immunol., 48(4): 251-261
Gautam V.K., and Gupta S.C., 1993, Development of shoots and roots in anther-derived callus of Azidodirecta indica A. Juss. A medicinal tree, Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 34: 13-18
George E.F., 1993, Plant propagation by tissue culture. Part I: The Technology Exegetics Ltd., England
George E.F., and Sherrington P.D., 1984, Plant propagation by tissue culture. Handbook and directory of commercial Laboratories. Exegetics Ltd., England.
Hamed A.M., Ali E.A.M., and Bosh E.S., 2007, In vitro propagation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus L.), J. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(3): 218-226
Hazarika B.N., 2003, Acclimatization of tissue cultured plants, Curr. Sci., 85: 1704-1712
Joshee N., Bastola D.R., Agrawal V.P., and Yadav A.K., 2002, Lakoocha: A multipurpose tree of warm climate, In: Janick J., and Whipkey A. (eds.), Trends in new crops and new uses, ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, pp. 405-406
Juennel R., and Basavaraju R., 2012, In vitro nodal explants propagation of Aege marmelos (L.), Corr. Indian J. Innov. Dev., 1(8): 575-587.
Khan F.R., Ur-rahman H., Abbasi N.A., Ibrahim M., and Abbas G., 2010, In vitro shoot and root multiplication of jack fruit as affected by different concentrations of growth regulators, Sarhad J. Agric., 26(4): 533-538
Liu Xiaomei and Yang Guochen, 2011, Clonal micropropagation of guava (Psidium guajava L.) on nodal explants of mature elite cultivar, Int. J. Plant Biol., 2(1): 7-10
Mandalari G., Bennett R.N., Bisignano G., et al., 2007, Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids extracted from bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) peel, a byproduct of the essential oil industry, J. Appl. Microb., 103(6): 2056-2064
Maneechai S., De-Eknamkul W., Umehara K., Noguchi H., and Likhitwitayawuid K., 2012, Flavonoid and stilbenoid production in callus culture in Artocarpus lakoocka,Phytochemistry, 81: 42-49
Murashig T., and Skoog F., 1962, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473-497
Napier I., and Robbins M., 1989, Forest seeds and nursery practice in Nepal. pp. 94–95
Navarro V., and Delgado G., 1999, Two antimicrobial alkaloids from Bocconia arborea. J. Ethnopharmacol., 66(2): 223-226
Nower A.A., Emara H.A., Ibrahimand I.A., and Badr Elden A.M., 2005, Initiative studies on micropropagation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) in Egypt. Proceeding of the Sixth Arabian Conference for Horticulture. Dept of Hort Suez Univ Ismailia, Egypt
Pati R., Chandra R., Chauhan U.K., Mishra M., Srivastiva N., 2008, In vitro clonal propagation of bael (Aegle marmelos Corr.) cv. CISHB1 through enhanced axillary branching. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 14(4): 337-346
Pati R., Mishra M., Chandra R., and Muthukumar M., 2013. Histological and biochemical changes in Aegle marmelos Corr. before and after acclimatization, Tree Genet. Mol. Breeding., 3(3): 12-18.
Rahman M.A., and Amin M.N., 1995, High frequency in vitro plantlets regeneration from an endangered tree -- Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb, Plant Tissue Cult., 5(2): 137-145
Roy S.K., Islam M.S., Sen J., Hossainand A.B., and Hadiuzzaman S., 1993, Propagation of flood tolerant jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) by in vitro culture, Acta Hort., 336: 273-278
Roy S.K., Rahmanand S.L., and Majumdar R., 1990, In vitro propagation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.), J. Hort. Sci., 65(3): 355-358
Roy S.K., Royand P.K., and Brumfield R.G., 1996, In vitro propagation and establishment of a new cultivar of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) bearing fruits twice yearly, Acta Hort., 429: 497-502
Sambhandharaksa C., Thantivatana P., and Ratanachai T., 1962, Pharmacognostical and phytochemical studies of Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb. used for treatment of tapeworm infection, J. Nat. Res. Counc. Thailand, 3: 245-255
Shailendra K.M.B., Rakesh K.M.C., Bharath A.C., Vinod K.H.R., Prashith K.T.R., Nandini K.C., Rakshitha M.N., and Raghavendra H.L., 2010, Screening of selected biological activities of Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb (Moraceae) fruit pericarp, J. Basic Clin. Pharm., 1(4): 239-245
Sharma V.B., and Pandey M.A., 1996, In vitro rapid multiplication and propagation of Cratacra mavala,Indian J. Exp. Biol., 34: 243-246
Singh R.B., 1993, Research and development of fruits in the Asia-Pacific, RAPA, Publ. 93/9 FA-RAPA, Bangkok, Thiland.
Tengamnuay P., Pengrungruangwong K., Pheansri I., Likhitwitayawuid K., 2006, Artocarpus lakoocha heartwood extract as a novel cosmetic ingredient: Evaluation of the in vitro anti-tyrosinase and in vivo skin whitening activities. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci., 28: 269-276